Dhruv Rathee’s Blunt Verdict On ‘Animal’ – A Regressive Cinema Misstep?

Dhruv Rathee, a popular social commentator, recently released a review of the film “Animal,” sparking heated discussions about how movies portray sensitive topics. Rathee’s main concern revolves around the film’s unchallenged portrayal of misogyny and toxic masculinity, and its potential to negatively impact society.

ALso ReaD: Animal Box Office: Beats Jawan, Ranbir’s Film Is A Box Office With 100% Return on Investment

Comparing “Animal” to Other Films:

Rathee starts by comparing “Animal” to other impactful films like “The White Ribbon” and “Udaan,” exploring how cinema has handled similar sensitive themes. This comparison helps us understand how “Animal” differs in its approach.

“Animal” as a “Cringe Fest”:

Known for his bluntness, Rathee describes “Animal” as a “cringe fest” and harmful to societal values. This strong criticism lays the groundwork for his detailed analysis of the film’s problems.

Also ReaD: Animal Box Office: Ranbir Kapoor starrer is the first ‘Adults Only’ certified Rs. 400 crores grosser

Insights from a Tihar Jail Survey:

Rathee cites a study by Madhumita Pandey conducted among Tihar Jail inmates, highlighting a lack of remorse among some rapists. This disturbing finding sheds light on the film’s potential to normalize harmful behavior.

Connecting Power, Anger, and Misogyny:

Rathee critically observes the common thread among “Animal” characters who display power, anger, and sadism: their shared perception of women as inferior. This analysis exposes the film’s potential to reinforce dangerous stereotypes.

Protecting Children from Harmful Influences:

Rathee voices concern about the impact of movies like “Animal” on children, especially those facing negative influences in their environment. He emphasizes the need to protect children from exposure to such potentially harmful content.

Also ReaD: After Sam Bahadur In Theatres, Animal’s OTT Premiere To Clash With This Film

The Absence of Redemption:

Rathee’s core criticism lies in the film’s portrayal of misogyny and toxic masculinity without any redemption. He compares it to a harmful sermon, highlighting the lack of positive consequences for the characters and story.

Contributing to a Regressive Society:

Rathee’s overarching concern is that films like “Animal” contribute to a regressive social climate. By perpetuating harmful stereotypes without offering counter-narratives, the movie risks reinforcing detrimental societal views.

This simplified version of the review focuses on Dhruv Rathee’s key criticisms of “Animal” and their potential implications, using plain English and concise language for easier understanding.